April 26, 2024

Programmatic

In a world where nearly everyone is always online, there is no offline.

Prog IO: Google’s Brad Bender On Balancing Web Stakeholders, Without Breaking The Web

<p>Sometimes it seems impossible to reconcile the demands of users, publishers and advertisers, the three main stakeholders of the ad-supported internet. “It’s really important that all three of these constituencies can benefit from digital advertising,” said Brad Bender, VP of product management for Google’s buy and sell-side advertising technology. On topics like privacy, web-tracking cookies<span class="more-link">... <span>Continue reading</span> »</span></p> <p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://adexchanger.com/online-advertising/prog-io-googles-brad-bender-on-balancing-web-stakeholders-without-breaking-the-web/">Prog IO: Google’s Brad Bender On Balancing Web Stakeholders, Without Breaking The Web</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://adexchanger.com">AdExchanger</a>.</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ad-exchange-news/~4/cwVJVs1NqnU" height="1" width="1" alt="" />

Sometimes it seems impossible to reconcile the demands of users, publishers and advertisers, the three main stakeholders of the ad-supported internet.

“It’s really important that all three of these constituencies can benefit from digital advertising,” said Brad Bender, VP of product management for Google’s buy and sell-side advertising technology.

On topics like privacy, web-tracking cookies and online ad auctions, Google is more challenged than ever to strike a balance between digital media stakeholders.

In a fireside chat Tuesday at AdExchanger’s Programmatic I/O conference in San Francisco, Bender discussed some of the controversial changes Google is making.

First-price auctions

In March, Google announced that it is switching to first-price auctions for inventory on Google Ad Manager, the last major exchange to make that transition.

Second-price auctions are the most profitable for sellers, Bender said. And Google shows its commitment to second-price theory with its own properties – YouTube, Gmail, AdSense and Google Search.

But the second-price model only works best when there’s a single auction, and the reality is that inventory now goes through a range of bidding options.

For instance, publishers with large direct sales businesses, such as The New York Times, Condé Nast or The Weather Company, have hundreds of different rules within their auctions, because direct-sold deals often include guaranteed pricing. Publishers also set different pricing floors for specific buyers, the most popular example being higher floors for Google’s DSP, Display and Video 360 (DV360).

Google’s contentious recent auction changes, collectively called “unified pricing,” limit the number of rules publishers can set and disable publishers from targeting certain buyers with higher price floors.

But the move has created significant friction with publishers. At a meeting last month, some top US publishers strongly pushed back against Google’s unified pricing, particularly because the product tweak benefits DV360.

Bender played down the heightened tension between publishers and Google, calling it a “spirited discussion” with those media companies and adding that Google is still in a testing period with the changes.

Ad server choice

Publishers “always have a choice” in how they serve ads, Bender said.

In Europe, some large publishers, including Axel Springer, the largest European news company, left Google’s supply-side technology over product changes made after GDPR went into effect.

Google is also adding carrots for publishers, Bender said, such as access to DV360 bid prices that previously weren’t passed to sellers. Google is also giving up its “last look,” a major advantage it gave to DV360 by letting it bid a penny more than the winning price from other bidders.

Bender said Google goes through expansive beta testing for product changes like these and will be able to demonstrate value from unified pricing.

“As we roll it out, we do have ability to make shifts to make sure it works for everyone,” he said. “But we’re trying to balance the complexity with creating a fair and transparent market.”

The cookie crumbles

Cookies have seemingly been on a farewell tour for years, but Google is taking new steps away from the historical web-tracking technology.

Google is working on new identity protocols for the Chrome browser, Bender said, as browsers like Firefox and Safari disable more ad targeting and tracking options.

What those changes could look like is still up in the air, but any change from Chrome to be more like Safari’s Intelligent Tracking Prevention, which severely restricts the use of cookies, would have serious implications for publishers and advertisers. But if Chrome begins losing market share to Safari or Firefox, Google would respond.

“What’s driving this change is users and what users want,” he said.

And the ecosystem could benefit long term by easing its reliance on cookies, he said. People own multiple connected devices now and constantly jump between web browsers, mobile apps and connected television apps. Browser users also have more control over data collection, which limits cookies.

“There are going to be various ways in which there’s pressure on cookies, from regulators, Chrome and other browsers,“ he said. “As marketers, we’ll have to think about how we can do more with less.”

This post was syndicated from Ad Exchanger.